|
Shalom Michael,
LB4: Not a "Robin Hood"; but revolutionary change for the good of all
Michael wrote: "There will be Poor, Always!" The "Robin Hood" approach has NEVER worked, and anyone that thinks it can is
delusional!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood
"In the earliest sources Robin Hood is a commoner, but he was often later portrayed as an aristocrat, wrongfully dispossessed
of his lands and made into an outlaw."
"Aristocrat" a member of an aristocracy. The aristocracy are people considered to be in the highest social class in society,
who traditionally have land, money, and power.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy_(class)
The term "aristocracy" is derived from the Greek language aristokratia, meaning 'the rule of the best'. The term "aristocracy"
was first given in Athens to young citizens (the men of the ruling class) who led armies from the front line. Because military
bravery was highly regarded as a virtue in ancient Greece, it was assumed that the armies were being led by "the best". From
the ancient Greeks, the term passed on to the European Middle Ages for a similar hereditary class of military leaders often
referred to as the "nobility". As in ancient Greece, this was a slave-holding class of privileged men whose military role
allowed them to present themselves as the most "noble", or "best".
In the USA; "The term "Southern aristocracy" refers to families who acquired large land holdings in the American South before
the American Civil War and remain wealthy landowners to this day, or to families that lost their wealth in the 19th century
but continue to insist on deference."
LB4: The American "Middle-class" and the "working poor" are nothing more than slaves to the "Rich". The institutions of America,
and most of the western cultures, are designed to perpetuate a form of slavery; both physical and mental so that the Rich
can enjoy much gain without physical labor. Yet the institutions of higher learning dumb-down the very people whom they are
"educating" so that they believe that if they but work hard, they too will become rich some day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary
"A revolutionary is a person who either actively participates in, or advocates revolution. Also, when used as an adjective,
the term revolutionary refers to something that has a major, sudden impact on society or on some aspect of human endeavour.
The termboth as a noun and adjectiveis usually applied to the field of politics, and is occasionally used in the context of
science, invention or art. In politics, a revolutionary is someone who supports abrupt, rapid, and drastic change, while a
reformist is someone who supports more gradual and incremental change."
LB4: President Obama is not a "Robin Hood", he is a revolutionary. America and the entire world governments are in need of
revolutionary changes.
The "poor" can no longer be expected to keep supporting the rich while they and their familes suffer.
Obama won the election for president of America on the premise of "Change". He was supported by the global poor, the underclass
of most every culture on this planet.
http://www.obamaforchange.com/
"This is not a quiet time in our world's or nation's history. The ongoing fight against terrorism around the world, rising
gas prices, the effects of global warming, access to quality and affordable healthcare, are just some of the real life problems
we all face in this world and in our nation today.
With the right leadership, and a change of attitude and focus, Barack Obama brings a new viewpoint to discover solutions to
the problems at hand.
It's about time...It's about change."
LB4: take a look at the website http://www.whitehouse.gov/ and see the things in need of revolutionary changes. The "incremental
changes" of a "reformist" will not work in this day and time, we need change right now, not tommorrow. Not just any change,but
the right change from the "right Leadership"!
Lightbeing4
> A democracy cannot work without a small share of "rich", a medium share of "middle class" and a large portion of "poor".
President Obama is trying to save the democracy by providing the nation's poor a way to servive into the near future.
> If America turn it's back on the working poor and the homeless, the Rich would have to go to work.
> Lightbeing4
|
